Every now and again, I wonder if the entire world is controlled by a small number of people. People so strong, so powerful, and so rich they could use countries/governments as pawns/playthings.
Certain terms get thrown around so often.
New World Order
Global Elite
The Patriots (Metal Gear Solid)
Shadow Government
Illuminati
Free Masons
Templars
Etc
And they are accused of starting wars, crashing governments, controlling the media, and rigging the Oscars.
And of course, various people get accused of being part of the aforementioned groups/alliances.
George Soros
David Rockfeller
The Rockefeller Family
The Rothschild Family
Bill Gates
The Bush Family
The Clinton Family
Putin
Etc
However, I've not found anywhere an easy to read article/youtube video explaining who the global elite are. Until there is a video that goes by the title "top 10 globalists", it will take more digging to find out who these people are.
This article from Blacklisted News details a few of the major organizations that most likely make up the global elite.
Such organizations include:
The Council on Foreign Relations
The Trilateral Commission
The Institute for International Economies
I then wonder how all this came to be.
As far as I understand, the motive of the global elite is control. As much control as possible. My biases tell me the control is for nefarious reasons. But part of me wonders if some of the elites have good intentions but just botch the execution.
If the global elite is evil, it makes sense for the elite to want to destroy or enslave humanity to feed a god/ego complex or just for lulz.
If the global elite is good, maybe they want to take control of humanity because they believe that people are too dumb and stupid to make independent decisions.
Regardless, control seems to be their objective.
Sunday, March 25, 2018
Thursday, March 1, 2018
Existence according to Alex Jones
Link to the Joe Rogan podcast with Alex Jones as a guest.
While Alex's explanation is a little hard to follow, I'll summarize a few main points.
1. Elites are trying to open up an inter dimensional portal to outside worlds
2. Portals will bring in psychic vampire potbelly demon goblins to Earth and destroy the majority population
3. Satan is part of this
4. Elites want to merge with machines to live forever and dominate whatever Earth population that remains
5. Chemicals in the water supply are turning the frogs gay
6. It is time for human beings who love America and are patriots to rise up and stop this nonsense
7. Advanced AI systems are being developed on the internet (of things) to predict the future and eventually control the future
8. Justin Bieber
9. Humans operate on a 5th or 6th dimensional thinking plane
It is a lot to digest.
While Alex's explanation is a little hard to follow, I'll summarize a few main points.
1. Elites are trying to open up an inter dimensional portal to outside worlds
2. Portals will bring in psychic vampire potbelly demon goblins to Earth and destroy the majority population
3. Satan is part of this
4. Elites want to merge with machines to live forever and dominate whatever Earth population that remains
5. Chemicals in the water supply are turning the frogs gay
6. It is time for human beings who love America and are patriots to rise up and stop this nonsense
7. Advanced AI systems are being developed on the internet (of things) to predict the future and eventually control the future
8. Justin Bieber
9. Humans operate on a 5th or 6th dimensional thinking plane
It is a lot to digest.
Sunday, February 25, 2018
Monday, January 29, 2018
To Save the United States of America
The plan to save America would be a bottom up approach. Saving America would depend completely on the individual and then gradually rise up to higher levels of control.
Saving America would depend on enough Americans to believe in the goal.
Saving America starts with saving yourself.
Step one involves the individual identify his/her financial position. If he/she is in debt, it is his/her objective to get out of debt as soon as possible. After escaping debt, his/her next objective is to amass a giant war chest. However much money the individual needs will depend on the individual. Ideally, each individual would get into the position where he/she has enough money/wealth saved up for his/her remaining lifetime. Without completing this step, the next steps will be harder to achieve/less effective.
Step two involves saving the people close to you. This would be either your immediate family/close friends. Since not every person has the will or ability to fix his financial position, the men/women who have become established can do great work by helping those close to them. Saving others from themselves brings everyone closer to the goal of saving America. How a man/woman chooses to do this will be up to his/her own digression. Support should be devised best by creating win/win situations. Support could also be a win/lose situation but this is not as effective as saving America.
Step three involves getting involved in local politics/governance. Since the root of most problems is caused by the deferral of personal responsibility, it is a man/woman's goal to prevent the government from doing this. Simply preventing the government from getting larger or taking more control/responsibility, a man/woman is fulfilling his/her duty. Simply getting elected and doing absolutely nothing would be better then implementing a disastrous policy.
Step four involves getting further involved in politics/governance and repealing government powers/funding/regulations/laws/reach. It is possible there is some optimal level of government (the point where government spending results in the highest possible GDP/standard of living) but most conservatives would agree that the current scope of government is too much. By peeling back the power/size/scope of the government, the power/responsibility is returned back to the people. The individual will be free to succeed/fail at his/her own merits.
America will be saved when the federal budget is balanced and we no longer run yearly budget deficits. America will be saved when the national debt starts getting paid off. America will be saved when we no longer have trade deficits. I believe in America. I believe in you. Go be a patriot.
Saving America would depend on enough Americans to believe in the goal.
Saving America starts with saving yourself.
Step one involves the individual identify his/her financial position. If he/she is in debt, it is his/her objective to get out of debt as soon as possible. After escaping debt, his/her next objective is to amass a giant war chest. However much money the individual needs will depend on the individual. Ideally, each individual would get into the position where he/she has enough money/wealth saved up for his/her remaining lifetime. Without completing this step, the next steps will be harder to achieve/less effective.
Step two involves saving the people close to you. This would be either your immediate family/close friends. Since not every person has the will or ability to fix his financial position, the men/women who have become established can do great work by helping those close to them. Saving others from themselves brings everyone closer to the goal of saving America. How a man/woman chooses to do this will be up to his/her own digression. Support should be devised best by creating win/win situations. Support could also be a win/lose situation but this is not as effective as saving America.
Step three involves getting involved in local politics/governance. Since the root of most problems is caused by the deferral of personal responsibility, it is a man/woman's goal to prevent the government from doing this. Simply preventing the government from getting larger or taking more control/responsibility, a man/woman is fulfilling his/her duty. Simply getting elected and doing absolutely nothing would be better then implementing a disastrous policy.
Step four involves getting further involved in politics/governance and repealing government powers/funding/regulations/laws/reach. It is possible there is some optimal level of government (the point where government spending results in the highest possible GDP/standard of living) but most conservatives would agree that the current scope of government is too much. By peeling back the power/size/scope of the government, the power/responsibility is returned back to the people. The individual will be free to succeed/fail at his/her own merits.
America will be saved when the federal budget is balanced and we no longer run yearly budget deficits. America will be saved when the national debt starts getting paid off. America will be saved when we no longer have trade deficits. I believe in America. I believe in you. Go be a patriot.
Saturday, November 25, 2017
Life Extension (implications)
While in America, the life expectancy is about 78 years, it is possible to see records of people that lived past 100 years. I think that the record for oldest person in the world is 120 years. It makes me wonder how old a person could live. Biblical accounts have people living for hundreds of years to as long as 1000 years. How accurate those accounts are is speculation but it is nice to have myths.
Repeatedly, I hear that there is some sort of life expectancy technology but there is little to no detail about how it works or what kind of results it can product. People say it is suppressed from the general public.
To satisfy my curiosity, I just typed in "Life Extension Technology" into YouTube and clicked the first video that popped up.
It is a 26 minute long video by Issac Arthur about the implications of such Life Extension. Not much detail is provided about current, developing, or future technology but it is an interesting view about life after such technology is released to the public.
Repeatedly, I hear that there is some sort of life expectancy technology but there is little to no detail about how it works or what kind of results it can product. People say it is suppressed from the general public.
To satisfy my curiosity, I just typed in "Life Extension Technology" into YouTube and clicked the first video that popped up.
It is a 26 minute long video by Issac Arthur about the implications of such Life Extension. Not much detail is provided about current, developing, or future technology but it is an interesting view about life after such technology is released to the public.
Saturday, October 28, 2017
Who really can you believe anyway?
While I've heard that government statistics can be far from accurate, I've never really given it much thought if I could rely on that information or not. If it was a lie, how would I know it was a lie? How would I figure out the truth? It would be far easier to just assume that any government statistic is true. After all, I trust numbers. Those don't lie to me.
But when I run across an example where government officials just purely mess up to the point where it can't be hidden, then I realize that if I can't verify it, I just can't trust it.
A few weeks ago, I was curious about the population of Atlanta. Most people would say the population was 5 million people but that would include all the metro areas. The city itself only has a population of about 500,000 people. But just to make sure, I did a quick google search.
The most recent statistics put the population at 472,000 (as of 2016). It didn't even break 500,000. However, the chart looked a little weird. In 1999, the population was 401,000 and steadily increased to 540,000 in 2009. In 2010, the population took a nose dive and hit 422,000 and started steadily increasing from there.
How did this happen? How did Atlanta lose over 100,000 people over the course of a year. I was still in college at the time and I didn't hear stories of people rushing out of the city.
As it turns out, the census was taken in 2010 and a lot of estimates since the previous census were drastically incorrect. The details are explained in an article from the AJC.
I used to think I could trust basic stats as simple as population but even something as basic as "how many people live in a certain area" can be a very complex thing to figure out.
But when I run across an example where government officials just purely mess up to the point where it can't be hidden, then I realize that if I can't verify it, I just can't trust it.
A few weeks ago, I was curious about the population of Atlanta. Most people would say the population was 5 million people but that would include all the metro areas. The city itself only has a population of about 500,000 people. But just to make sure, I did a quick google search.
The most recent statistics put the population at 472,000 (as of 2016). It didn't even break 500,000. However, the chart looked a little weird. In 1999, the population was 401,000 and steadily increased to 540,000 in 2009. In 2010, the population took a nose dive and hit 422,000 and started steadily increasing from there.
How did this happen? How did Atlanta lose over 100,000 people over the course of a year. I was still in college at the time and I didn't hear stories of people rushing out of the city.
As it turns out, the census was taken in 2010 and a lot of estimates since the previous census were drastically incorrect. The details are explained in an article from the AJC.
I used to think I could trust basic stats as simple as population but even something as basic as "how many people live in a certain area" can be a very complex thing to figure out.
Sunday, October 15, 2017
US Life Expectancy Stalls
A quick google search reveals the following details.
US life expectancy is as of 2015 78.74 years. This is completely level since 2012.
In 2011, life expectancy was 78.64.
The life expectancy first broke 78 years in 2008.
The google search only has data up until 2015 and around December 2016, there was a flood of stories talking about the life expectancy declining for the first time in 20 years. I suppose the decline is noticed in a rounding error.
Towards the end of December, the information for 2016 might be released.
US life expectancy is as of 2015 78.74 years. This is completely level since 2012.
In 2011, life expectancy was 78.64.
The life expectancy first broke 78 years in 2008.
The google search only has data up until 2015 and around December 2016, there was a flood of stories talking about the life expectancy declining for the first time in 20 years. I suppose the decline is noticed in a rounding error.
Towards the end of December, the information for 2016 might be released.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)